Skip to main content

Post of the day!

The 2026 Global Responsibility Landscape: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Responsible Nations Index and Comparative Benchmarks

 The 2026 Global Responsibility Landscape: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Responsible Nations Index and Comparative Benchmarks 1. Executive Introduction: Redefining National Success in the 21st Century The 2026 Global Responsibility Landscape is defined by a strategic pivot in the global metrics of sovereignty. For nearly a century, national standing was dictated by the crude mathematics of GDP-centric power and military hegemony. The launch of the Responsible Nations Index (RNI) 2026 on January 19, 2026, at the Dr. Ambedkar International Centre , executes a normative disruption of this status quo. This index is not merely a new lens; it is a "normative disruptor" intended to de-legitimize raw economic output as the sole arbiter of state success. As former President of India Ram Nath Kovind declared during the unveiling, the RNI serves as a "mirror of morality," reflecting whether states are fulfilling their fundamental ethical obligations to their citizens and t...
Post a Comment

Article 1 Explained: India, That is Bharat – Name and Territory of the Union | Constitution Series [Part 1]

Article 1,Part 1,Name and territory of the Union,India,that is Bharat,Clause,Importance,Constitution Series [Part 1],


Article 1 – Name and territory of the Union

  1. India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.
  2. The States and the territories thereof shall be as specified in the First Schedule.
The territory of India shall comprise –
(a) the territories of the States;
(b) the Union territories specified in the First Schedule; and
(c) such other territories as may be acquired.

Explanation of Article 1

Clause 1: India, that is Bharat

‘India, that is Bharat’ shall remain a Union of States. In other words, for the entire world, the name of the country is India, and India is also Bharat — or we can say that constitutionally, both names “India” and “Bharat” are recognized for the country.

It shall remain a Union of States — these states cannot separate from the country. This group of states has not been created like a federal agreement (as in the USA); rather, all the states together make up India. States have no right to separate from the Union.

Clause 2: States and Territories

The First Schedule of the Indian Constitution is connected in some way to Articles 1 and 4. This schedule is divided into two parts:

  • Part 1 contains the names of all the States.
  • Part 2 contains the names of all the Union Territories.

Clause 3: The territory of India shall comprise

A. India includes all the states, or we can say all the states of the country belong to India.

B. All the Union Territories that are given in the First Schedule.

C. All the territories that India has acquired or may acquire in the future — whether through war, agreement, or treaty — will be considered an integral part of India.

Importance of Article 1

  • Article 1 clears the confusion regarding the many names of India and states clearly: India, that is Bharat.
  • The country is a Union of States, and no state can separate from it. This strengthens the Constitution and keeps the country away from systems where any state can say, "We no longer want to stay with the country," and leave.
  • The division between States and Union Territories is based on their characteristics. Also, Clause 3(c) of Article 1 makes it clear that if the country acquires any new territory in the future, it will be considered a part of India.
  • In conclusion, Article 1 gives a structural definition to the country — that this nation is made up of a group of small and large states.

“Article 2 of the Indian Constitution: Admission and Establishment of New Stats”









Labels:
Location: India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Disconnected Journalism: The Absence of Passion and Core Values in Modern Media Professionals

In recent years, journalism has witnessed a disconcerting shift. While once a vocation pursued by individuals deeply connected to society, today's media landscape increasingly hosts professionals who seem detached from the communities they serve. The allure of quick fame, coupled with an education system that focuses on technical skills over core journalistic values, has led to a media culture that often lacks empathy and integrity. Many aspiring journalists enter the industry without a genuine passion for the craft or a true understanding of their role in society. This trend not only impacts the quality of news but also contributes to a growing public mistrust of media. Disconnected Journalism: The Absence of Passion and Core Values in Modern Media Professionals The Gap in Journalistic Passion and Commitment Journalism has traditionally been more than a job—it’s been a calling. Great journalists like Edward R. Murrow , Ida B. Wells , and Anna Politkovskaya pursued their work with...
Post a Comment
CONTINUE»

The Core Values of Journalism: Lessons in Life and Integrity

The Core Values of Journalism: Lessons in Life and Integrity As a journalism student, I’ve come to understand that the values which shape a good journalist are the same ones that define a person of character. Journalism isn’t just about crafting stories or uncovering facts; it’s about pursuing truth, staying grounded, and reflecting on what it means to live with integrity. In many ways, journalism holds up a mirror to the values we ought to embody as human beings. Journalism, as I see it, is less of a career and more of a guide to life. It teaches you to look deeply into situations, understand perspectives beyond your own, and remain grounded despite challenges. To survive in this world and the world of journalism, three qualities seem essential: common sense , flexibility , and being a good judge . These principles don’t just help you excel as a journalist; they build the foundation of a meaningful life. Common Sense: The Quiet Strength We All Need Common sense may sound like somethin...
Post a Comment
CONTINUE»

"Article 7 Explained: Who Is an Indian Citizen After Migration?"

Just as Article 6 of the Constitution explains how a person migrating from Pakistan to India can become eligible for Indian citizenship, in the same way, Article 7 of the Constitution talks about those who migrated from India to Pakistan and under what conditions they may or may not be considered citizens of India. What does Article 7 say? “Rights of citizenship of certain migrants to Pakistan.— Notwithstanding anything in Articles 5 and 6 , a person who has after the 1st day of March 1947 migrated from the territory of India to the territory now included in Pakistan shall not be deemed to be a citizen of India: Provided that nothing in this article shall apply to a person who, after having migrated to the territory now included in Pakistan, has returned to the territory of India under a permit for resettlement or permanent return issued by or under the authority of any law.” Explanation of Article 7 Article 7 of the Indian Constitution is about those persons who, afte...
Post a Comment
CONTINUE»